Yes its true, we have all read the buzz about Google's intention to generate a Social Media Servicetool that may ultimately put the popularity of an website in the hands of the average user.
When I first learned about this, I thought; what recommended! After careful consideration of all of the factors involved, I have recently visit the conclusion that I don't think the addition for this newly anticipated Google Plus tab might be an effective tool regarding measuring a website's value. My reason is uncomplicated; the human factor concerned.
Imagine that you a company in a highly competitive niche, such as, real estate property. Your website finally gets ranked in a very nice position on the SERP's (Optimization Pages) and you may have an influx of organic traffic.
You think to yourself, all of your diligence is coming together as well as being finally paying off. You have been in business for a long time and have a large amount of clientele. Your social media as well as SEO is all up to date and you work hard on the continuous promotion of your branding and over the internet presence. You have done everything "white hat" and from now on you are finally staying rewarded.
The very next day you might be in shock to realize which you have fallen back on a SERP's and you have no notion why. After further study, you discover the website which has taken over your spot has a large number of Google plus one thumbs upwards. How is this likely? The human factor.
Any one of them factors could have contributed towards your falling back on a SERP's:
The website has paid for people to give these a thumbs up.
Someone incorporates a grudge against your web page or you personally and merely liked another website to control this.
Some crafty SEO expert realized that it is a crafty way to get extra traffic but doesn't have any real value to figure out a website's true popularity.
The new website is much more popular as compared to yours. You think to yourself, it has only been around cheaper than one month, does not necessarily sound realistic or reasonable somehow?
Do not get me wrong me, social media a great addition to Google's brand-new ranking system.
It created a means to stop a whole lot of black hat SEO tactics and things have improved greatly in the internet. Companies now how to prove relevance, engage with their clients and grow more forthcoming in relation to using SEO techniques if they need to get top spots on the SERPS's. This has offered a more level playing field for over the internet business. The value for this fact alone is immeasurable.
It is my opinion. however, anytime you encourage the public too much freedom it creates a natural environment that can foster violent behavior. Humans sometimes seem to still find it fun to "ruffle feathers. " Advertised . isn't, but there are always likely to be bad apples in every single bunch.
Social media isn't any exception to this principle, there are bad apples creating drama when i write this very posting.
I think social media channels was exactly what the internet needed to boost spirits. It allowed for a more open business to client communication process when it comes to website brand and popularity. Ultimately, consumers are the individuals who are actually using products and services it made sense that they must be the ones to promote them likewise, but let's face it, too much popular impression and freedom has the potential to generate a lot of damage.
We view the damage humans have created everyday as well as the Internet is no exclusion. Just take a look at a lot of the social media out there now, it is not all being employed for good.
I am firm believer in may enhance the social media and I trust most humans, but I will be also realistic and When i carefully consider each side associated with an idea before I formulate a feeling.
In the end, my very own opinion is that I simply do not see how Google may possibly monitor this new function effectively. Someone can literally sit for hours clicking on websites giving them thumbs ups. What good is that in determining brand popularity?
Things have been enormously improving for the search engine ranking systems with the addition of social media and pertinent unique content to the algorithm.
Why fix it, if it is not necessarily broken? To be frank, we have all seen the effects of these bad maneuvers before; things like identical blog content, spun articles or blog posts, software that manipulated quantities and bogus back-links....... exactly where are we now with regard to SEO and social media channels?
We are back to the beginning and back to diligence being the only true method to pay!
I think Google is onto wise, they just have to work harder in order that it will pay as well as play. If they can ensure it can't be easily manipulated when you Buy google +1 then it that are a great new tool but I will be reserving my thumbs ups for now.
No comments:
Post a Comment